Agenda 21 Revealed – You Need to Know This
Agenda 21 Revealed – You Need to Know This | Lucille Femine
Originally Published in the Las Vegas Guardian Express on 21 September, 2013
Reprinted with written permission of author
Agenda 21 is a major tool of the New World order, conceived in 1992 in Rio DeJaniero at the “Earth Summit.” Its original name, “Sustainable Development”, began in 1987 with Gro Harlem Brundtland, VP of the World Socialist Party. Heavily promoted to the public as the salvation for this planet and every human being, it is anything but that. It needs to be revealed in no uncertain terms so you know what it truly is.By putting this data out here, I might be labeled a prominent member of the lunatic fringe but I believe we have an ethical obligation to present truth, as we see it. If I’m wrong – well, I’ll be embarrassed but then I’ll be relieved because maybe this insanity won’t happen after all.
However, there is growing evidence this rotten egg called Agenda 21 has been hatching for quite some time, under our very noses. And it stinks.
At that momentous meeting, 178 nations signed the document; President Bush signed for the U.S. Later President Clinton signed an executive order, basically demanding compliance from every state and community with the goals and plans of Agenda 21 which is fast coming about as official policy in every town, city and state
Compassionate-sounding terms like “Population Stabilization” and “Sustainable Development” are simply masks for the true purpose of this United Nations plan – a world domination of your life and liberty, basically an insidious plot to control any and all parts of existence.
According to its authors, sustainability focuses on three things: “global land use, global education and global population control and reduction”. Doesn’t sound too bad, does it? However, in actual practice, these concepts pan out far below their lofty rhetoric.
The true objectives of Agenda 21, revealed, include an end to national sovereignty; restructure of the family unit which means basically the state will take care of your children, with a keen eye toward indoctrinating them into state control over family allegiance; abolition of private property with citizens crammed into “stack and pack”, hi-rise apartment buildings, close to railroad tracks while cars will not be allowed.
Santa Cruz has already been granted 300 million federal dollars to build these apartment buildings. In exchange for their willingness to participate in these sustainable acts, they are given immunity to construction-defect liability.
In Washington, one of these hi-risers is a nine story building with no elevators, where tenants share a bath and kitchen with seven other tenants.
Santa Cruz has been the test case for putting Agenda 21 on the whole map. Speaking of maps, there is a very startling one which shows the aim of the Wildlands Project, part of Agenda 21 – how fifty percent of the country, under this new system, will be off-limits to humans, while most of the rest of the land will be highly controlled. There are little black spots on the map which show the locations of all the high-risers which will be built.
Agenda 21’s logo centers around three symbols which represent “Es”. The first one is Equity which uses law to change justice from social to equal. The idea of the “Precautionary Principle” means one is not allowed to harm anything, even small animals and even on one’s own property.
The second one is Economy which will replace free enterprise with public/private partnerships. In other words, as Hitler called it, Fascism.
The third is Environmental which basically puts nature above man.
The main focus of Agenda 21 is to take control of the land because once they do that, they can control any human activity.
Then there’s Global Citizenship Education Program, evidenced in the “No Child Left Behind” program. Our children will be educated into collectivism.
The third is control over and great reduction of population; whoever is left will be congregated in those crowded communities of hi-risers.
These globalists present the notion that the world population should not be more than 500 million. That means 93% of the existing population would have to be eliminated. How do you suppose they intend to accomplish that? Or have been accomplishing it?
The Democratic and Republican parties are both in favor of World Government. The strategy is to go from global to local, infusing every state and community with their programs. These are done with help of ICLEI, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Many in this group have been insinuating themselves into local governments to implement Agenda 21 policies and directives, all to the detriment of that city or community. As of 2011, they have moved into several cities in almost every state in the Union.
Harvey Ruvin, vice-chairman of ICLEI once said, “Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” That is eerily, historically familiar.
The good news is they are being fought hard – on that same local level. In Alabama last year, the governor banned any and all sustainability projects of the UN from being enforced in the state. It’s a law, Senate Bill 477, passed unanimously.
“It seems that Agenda 21 does actually bring people together in communities — just not in the way the U.N. had hoped for,” said Justice Gilpin-Green about this win in Alabama. Further, he said, ”It was citizen awareness and direct action that finally brought about the needed changes last week and that same awareness and action will be needed for the future of every other state.”
In New Hampshire, work is being none on a similar measure.
In Arizona, 2012, the bill prohibiting any UN sustainability passed in the Senate and looks like it’s a go in the House.
This is the only way to beat them, as individuals, members of a community, city or state; do everything possible to ban Agenda 21 from an area.
This is how Alabama did it because the governor, who was not willing to give up federal funding, was finally won over by a grassroots protest.
That’s the carrot they dangle – federal funding. It’s no better than welfare and much more deadly to our freedom because it’s only meant to control and suppress on a grander scale than has ever existed before.
https://ruralsurvival.info/agenda_21_revealed_lf.shtml
This the response of any intelligent person who does not have a financial or ethical dog in the fight. imo
NY doctor: Sex ed harmful to kids’ health
According to American psychiatrist Dr. Miriam Grossman, the controversial sex ed curriculum about to be unleashed by Ontario’s Liberal government is being implemented to indoctrinate students with a dangerous sexual agenda — not to teach them science.
While speaking to a crowd of approximately 1,000 sex ed curriculum opponents, Grossman laid out fact after fact about the detrimental effects, intents and purposes of the program that will be taught in all publicly funded schools across Ontario next week. At the conclusion of her hour-long seminar, she received a standing ovation for laying out the raw facts about the problematic sex ed curriculum — keeping her promise to equip parents with “ammunition in your battle.”
“The priority [of the Ontario curriculum] is not your child’s health,” the sex ed critic, writer, and international speaker informed her audience on August 18, according to LifeSiteNews. “The priority is to mold your child’s thinking and attitudes so that they respect and affirm and are comfortable with all sexual choices and lifestyles.”
United in uncovering the deception
Less than three months after the radical sex ed curriculum was announced in February by the Liberal government headed by openly lesbian Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, disgruntled parents established a coalition of more than two dozen parental rights associations, organizations and social media groups, called the Canadian Families Alliance (CFA).
Since spring, CFA — representing more than 200,000 parents from diverse faith, cultural and ethnic backgrounds — has launched successful campaigns, including protests, petitions, car rallies, Facebook assemblies, viral Internet messaging and a strike that kept 35,000 children out of school to show discontent with the impending sex ed program this fall.
Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) Project Manager Jack Fonseca said that his CFA-affiliated organization will help to remove the deceptive mask covering Wynne’s new curriculum strewn with sexual libertinism.
“[We] will completely debunk the myths and lies about the Liberal sex education curriculum that have been put out by Premier Wynne and her allies in the media,” Fonseca promised after viewing videos presented by Grossman about the controversial program. “With unassailable logic and simple, down-to-earth language, Dr. Grossman has proven without a shadow of a doubt that the Ontario sex ed curriculum is not about protecting the health and safety of children, but rather, pushing an agenda of sexual revolution which makes children more unhealthy and more unsafe.”
Fonseca expressed his gratitude for how the New York-based psychiatrist exposed the underlying objective and intended results of the problematic curriculum.
“In this dynamite lecture, Grossman has set fire to the Liberal house of cards which claims that the updated curriculum is necessary to help students ‘develop healthy relationships,’” the CLC leader continued. “To the contrary, you will learn why this curriculum will lead children to developing very unhealthy relationships — not to mention a lot more sexually transmitted diseases.”
Accolades for Grossman’s revealing presentation were mirrored by CFA leader and retired teacher, Lou Iacobelli, who authors the blog Everyday for Life Canada.
“[Grossman’s presentation is] an incredible resource [that backs up using documentation from the sex ed curriculum] what parents have been saying all along — that this curriculum is age-inappropriate and puts children at risk,” asserted Iacobelli, who noted that Grossman has seen the effects of such liberal programs firsthand.
Fighting the failed experiment on students
After serving as a UCLA clinic physician more than a decade ago and witnessing “thousands and thousands” of students needlessly suffering from making foolish “sexual choices” based on liberal sex ed teachings, Grossman began researching the detrimental effects and campaigning against such state-funded agendas, which led her to write Unprotected and You’re Teaching My Child WHAT?
CLC’s United Nations representative, Matt Wojciechowski, argues that Ontario’s sex ed curriculum is by no way contained to the borders of the eastern Canadian province, stressing that parents around the world must counter the aggressive global agenda pushing “sexual rights,” which he notes is orchestrated by International Planned Parenthood Federation and its allies (including the Obama administration).
“What Wynne is bringing to Ontario is just scratching the surface of a larger global agenda,” Wojciechowski informed LifeSiteNews. “Parents need to continue opposing her radical sex ed curriculum for the well-being and safety of their children, but at the same time, they need to be made aware that this will not be the final assault.”
Wojciechowski went on to emphasize that world governments are teaming with the U.N. and Planned Parenthood to wreak havoc on the youth generation.
“[There is] a growing international ‘sexual rights’ movement that is very visible, especially at the United Nations,” the pro-family advocate pointed out. “It is championed by the International Planned Parenthood Federation and other like-minded organizations, which are determined to expand their radical views to every corner of the planet. [IPPF and its allies] are obsessed with exporting abortion on demand, redefining gender, altering the traditional family and imposing sex-education programs on every culture, race and faith group.”
Fight for kids now or watch them suffer later
Grossman ended her presentation by exhorting parents to protect their children, no matter what — even though the mainstream media routinely ignores their message.
“Stand firm [even though] the creators and supporters of this curriculum see themselves as noble and compassionate, [trying to convince you that] you’re the problem,” Grossman encouraged parents at her August presentation. “[T]he underlying message is that anyone who disagrees with this curriculum must be uneducated or a bigot.”
Her final words to seminar attendees incited parents to action.
“Your voices matter,” Grossman concluded. “Science is in your corner. Parents know what’s best for their children — not educator activists.”
Fonseca concurred with a similar parting message.
“Let’s set fire to the whole Liberal curriculum,” Fonseca urged the energetic crowd. “Share this powerful, evidence-based, science-backed lecture with teachers, school trustees, parents, politicians and everyone you know. It’s time for the Liberal lie to die.”
A brisk 25-minute walk every day can add up to SEVEN YEARS to your life and cut risk of dying from a heart attack by half
Taking a brisk 25-minute walk a day can add seven years to your life, scientists claim.
New research has found that regular exercise can reduce the risk of dying from a heart attack by half.
Even people who do not start exercising until they are in their 70s can still improve their health, the academics behind the study say.
Taking a brisk 25-minute walk a day can add seven years to your life, scientists claim (file picture)
Sanjay Sharma, professor of cardiac diseases at St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in London, said gentle exercise can reduce the risk of dying from a heart attack in the average person's 50s and 60s by half.
'This study is very relevant. It suggests that when people exercise regularly they may be able to retard the process of ageing,' he said.
'We may never avoid becoming completely old, but we may delay the time we become old. We may look younger when we're 70 and may live into our 90s.
'Exercise buys you three to seven additional years of life. It is an anti-depressant, it improves cognitive function and there is now evidence that it may retard the onset of dementia.'
People who start exercising at the age of 70 are less likely to go on to develop atrialfibrillation, a heart rhythm condition that affects about 10 per cent of people over 80.
The research was carried out by a team at Saarland University in Germany, who introduced a group of non-exercising but otherwise healthy and non-smoking people to a programme of exercise.
It showed that aerobic exercise, high intensity interval training and strength training all have a positive impact on markers of ageing.
The authors found endurance exercise and high intensity exercise to be more efficient at achieving good health than just lifting weights, and is more likely to trigger the anti-ageing process.
Christi Deaton, professor at the Cambridge Institute of Public Health, said: 'The more active you are, and it doesn't matter when you start, the more benefit you are going to have.
'We recommend people who have cardiovascular disease or had myocardial infarction or heart failure to be physically active, because it's beneficial for them; so there's really no reason for healthy people not to exercise as well.
'The study brings a bit more understanding of why physical activity has that effect.
'It helps us understand the process of cellular ageing as that's what drives our organ system and body ageing and the effects physical activity can have on the cellular level.'
No comments:
Post a Comment